Unless some student saved a copy, this is title of a manual which no longer exists. GMU does not have a copy. The 38 page manual was printed for use as a handout at a summer session program in England, where Warfield was one of the professors. The manual contained copies of transparencies used in the lectures. Warfield saved the title page on his computer to have a record of the transparencies he used. This is the record of this summer session program in his vita: - PRESENTATIONS (1995 AND 1996) - " Interactive Management, two half-days of lecturing at the Fourth European Systems School, University of Humberside, Kingston-on-Hull, United Kingdom, 17- 18 July 1995."
After the seminars in England we did not get back home with any of the printed manuals, so there is no hard copy. To reassemble this report it will be necessary to dig out the files from the computer, one by one, and print them out. This is the list of cells:
What is Interactive Management?; Why Interactive Management?; The Sigma -5 Meeting; IM Options Field (Part 1 of 3); IM Options Field (Part 1 of 3)--Choosing Options; IM Options Field (Part 2 of 3); IM Options Field (Part 2 of 3)--Choosing Options; IM Options Field (Part 3 of 3); IM Options Field (Part 3 of 3)--Choosing Options, Uniqueness of Interactive Management; Dimensions of Poor Productivity in Organizations; Visual Comparisons of Participant Voting on Top Five Problems (Example of the Spreadthink Voting Pattern); Dependency Sequence Involving Components of the Mathematics of Modeling; The Route to Implementation of Structural Thinking; Attributes of Structural Thinking—1; Attributes of Structural Thinking—2; Some Attributes of Structural Thinking 1; Some Attributes of Structural Thinking 2; Some Attributes of Structural Thinking 3.
Attributes of Structural Thinking, Attribute #1: Set Generation Examples; Attributes of Structural Thinking, Attribute #2: Relationship Focus Examples; Attributes of Structural Thinking, Attribute #4: Relationship Production Examples; Attributes of Structural Thinking, Attribute #5: Structural Feature Interpretation Examples; Attributes of Structural Thinking, Attribute #6: Family of Patterns Production Examples; Attributes of Structural Thinking, Attribute #7: Computer Assistance Examples; Attributes of Structural Thinking, Attribute #10:Formal Logic Application Examples.
Criteria for Structural Thinking (Context: In an Organization)--Part 1; Criteria for Structural Thinking (Context: In an Organization)--Part 2; Criteria for Structural Thinking (Context: In an Organization)--Part 3; Criteria for Structural Thinking (Context: In an Organization)--Part 4; Criteria for Structural Thinking (Context: In an Organization)--Part 5;
CONSENSUS METHODOLOGIES: #1, Ideawriting; CONSENSUS METHODOLOGIES: #2 Nominal Group Technique; CONSENSUS METHODOLOGIES: #3 DELPHI; CONSENSUS METHODOLOGIES: #4 Interpretive Structural Modeling; CONSENSUS METHODOLOGIES: #5 Options Field; CONSENSUS METHODOLOGIES: #6 Options Profile; CONSENSUS METHODOLOGIES: #7 Tradeoff Analysis. (The computer file to use for a single printing is gone for good. Some day if I should live so long maybe I can reconstitute the file for the cell packet; it looks like a handy little manual to have for reference.) See also “Four Case Studies,” another manual used with this same summer session program.
R.w. 5/29/12
