In the report titled “Design and Manufacturing Methodologies,” Japanese management and manufacturing methods are examined and compared with Warfield's Interactive Management process, with the recommendation that in spite of the success of the Japanese management tools, Warfield's IM process was superior and should replace other methods. The forerunner of the report was a Ford technical report titled "Development of End-User Access Tools to the Science of Design," January 1992. John revised the technical report to make it suitable for a general audience, removing specific references to Ford activities and personnel and giving it a new title and preface. John's revision was printed as an IASIS report, (February 1992) and later as a TIPP Working Paper, (March 1992) titled “Design and Manufacturing Methodologies.” Two years later the same material in these reports was used as Chapter 14 in Handbook of Interactive Management, 1994 by Warfield & Cardenas. R.w. July 19, 2013 ---------------------------- John has used four different titles 5 on different occasions for the same paper, which began in 1992 as a research report, was published in 1994 as a book chapter, and adapted in 1995 for a lecture: 1) ID 00195: Development of End-User Access Tools to the Science of Design. January 1992 Ford Report (Box 13 Folder 26 AND Box 50 Folder 4), 2) ID 01310: Design and Manufacturing Methodologies: A Comparison of American and Japanese Developments, IASIS monograph, February 1992 (Box 13 Folder 25 ), AND ID 00178: The Institute of Public Policy (TIPP) Working Paper a reprint of the IASIS monograph, March 1992, (Box 50 Folder 3), 3) ID 01309: Comparing IM With Methods Widely Used in Japan, Excerpts from Chapter 14 of IM Handbook, Iowa State University Press1994 (Box 20, folder 22 and box 13 folder 25), 4) ID 00093: Comparing American and Japanese Manufacturing-Related Methodologies, 1995 Seminar talk at George Washington Univ in D.C., November 1995.