This was mailed to Bill Newell, at Miami University, who is editor of the newsletter on May 4, 1997. As of May 1997, don't know if published or not, but Newell will probably print it, so to save later confusion I am going to call this thing a newsletter article.
Warfield chides the recent AIS newsletter discussion for omitting the thinking and input of Peirce and Hayek, continues with an appeal for fuller and more careful study of scholars of history rather than attempting to use a new epistomology to flaunt “new ideas” which are in fact several centuries old but expressed in another vocabulary.
